Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Simplify GuC communication handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Patchwork (2019-12-11 11:33:35)
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_parallel@rcs0-contexts:
>     - shard-iclb:         [PASS][1] -> [CRASH][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7534/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_parallel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15681/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_parallel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Where did __gem_execbuf() == -25 [ENOTTY] come from?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux