On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:32:58AM -0800, Niranjan Vishwanathapura wrote: > > And putting the cpu PFN of a ZONE_DEVICE device page into > > sg_dma_address still looks very wrong to me > > The below call in patch 7 does convert any cpu PFN to device address. > So, it won't be CPU PFN. > i915_dmem_convert_pfn(vm->i915, &range); Well, then it should be done here in patch 6, surely? > Also, only reason to use sgl list is because i915 driver page table update > functions takes an sgl, otherwise we can directly deal with range.pfns array. Maybe that should be fixed instead of abusing sgl Jason _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
