On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
> that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the
> dst rectangle seems appropriate. Should at least result in
> the clipped src and dst rectangles being a bit more consistent
> with each other.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> index a9c7f90836f3..1e1e2101007a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ bool drm_rect_intersect(struct drm_rect *r1, const struct drm_rect *r2)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_rect_intersect);
>
> -static u32 clip_scaled(u32 src, u32 dst, u32 clip)
> +static u32 clip_scaled(int src, int dst, int *clip)
Mild scare about this one here, but I think we've clamped everything
sufficiently now that silly stuff can't happen anymore. And everything in
here seems to cast to sufficiently big types (and we shouldn't have
negative values here I hope). I'll see how realistic that assumption is
when looking at the selftests. For this:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> {
> u64 tmp;
>
> @@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ static u32 clip_scaled(u32 src, u32 dst, u32 clip)
> return 0;
>
> /* Only clip what we have. Keeps the result bounded. */
> - clip = min(clip, dst);
> + *clip = min(*clip, dst);
>
> - tmp = mul_u32_u32(src, dst - clip);
> + tmp = mul_u32_u32(src, dst - *clip);
>
> /*
> * Round toward 1.0 when clipping so that we don't accidentally
> @@ -95,34 +95,34 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> diff = clip->x1 - dst->x1;
> if (diff > 0) {
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> - drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
> + drm_rect_width(dst), &diff);
>
> src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
> - dst->x1 = clip->x1;
> + dst->x1 += diff;
> }
> diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;
> if (diff > 0) {
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> - drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
> + drm_rect_height(dst), &diff);
>
> src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
> - dst->y1 = clip->y1;
> + dst->y1 += diff;
> }
> diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;
> if (diff > 0) {
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> - drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
> + drm_rect_width(dst), &diff);
>
> src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
> - dst->x2 = clip->x2;
> + dst->x2 -= diff;
> }
> diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;
> if (diff > 0) {
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> - drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
> + drm_rect_height(dst), &diff);
>
> src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
> - dst->y2 = clip->y2;
> + dst->y2 -= diff;
> }
>
> return drm_rect_visible(dst);
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
