Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Support more QGV points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:10:49PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to BSpec 53998, there is a mask of
> max 8 SAGV/QGV points we need to support.
> 
> Bumping this up to keep the CI happy(currently
> preventing tests to run), until all SAGV
> changes land.
> 
> Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112189
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 86e75e858008..d1b805b30177 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct intel_qgv_point {
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_qgv_info {
> -	struct intel_qgv_point points[3];
> +	struct intel_qgv_point points[I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS];
>  	u8 num_points;
>  	u8 num_channels;
>  	u8 t_bl;
> @@ -276,15 +276,27 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  static unsigned int intel_max_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  					int num_planes)
>  {
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Any bw group has same amount of QGV points
> +		 */
> +		const struct intel_bw_info *bi =
> +			&dev_priv->max_bw[0];
> +		unsigned int min_bw = UINT_MAX;
> +		int i;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * FIXME with SAGV disabled maybe we can assume
>  		 * point 1 will always be used? Seems to match
>  		 * the behaviour observed in the wild.
>  		 */
> -		return min3(icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 0),
> -			    icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 1),
> -			    icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 2));
> +		for (i = 0; i < bi->num_qgv_points; i++) {
> +			unsigned int bw = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, i);
> +
> +			min_bw = min(bw, min_bw);
> +		}
> +		return min_bw;
> +	}
>  	else
>  		return UINT_MAX;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index fdae5a919bc8..d45a9ffaed4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -621,6 +621,9 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
>  
>  #define I915_ENGINE_WEDGED_TIMEOUT  (60 * HZ)  /* Reset but no recovery? */
>  
> +/* BSpec precisely defines this */
> +#define I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS 8

I think everything else talks about "QGV points" rather
than "SAGV points" now? Would be nice to be consistent.

Apart from that
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +
>  struct ddi_vbt_port_info {
>  	/* Non-NULL if port present. */
>  	const struct child_device_config *child;
> @@ -1232,7 +1235,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  	} dram_info;
>  
>  	struct intel_bw_info {
> -		unsigned int deratedbw[3]; /* for each QGV point */
> +		/* for each QGV point */
> +		unsigned int deratedbw[I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS];
>  		u8 num_qgv_points;
>  		u8 num_planes;
>  	} max_bw[6];
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux