Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 22/11/2019 04:02, Ramalingam C wrote:
From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>

Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles).
FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is
implemented here.

At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence
disabling the WA verification.

v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar)
v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel)
v4:
   uncore read is used [Tvrtko]
   Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris]
v5:
   Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram]
   i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko]
v6:
   __wa_write_masked_or used with varying parameter [Tvrtko]
   Added wa_add as a wrapper for __wa_add [Chris]
v7:
   WA verification is skipped on all stepping as of now [Lucas]

BSpec: 19363
HSDES: 1604555607
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramlingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> [v5]
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h             |  4 +++
  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 399acae2f33f..b11540caa92d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -146,20 +146,33 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
  	}
  }
-static void
-wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
-		   u32 val)
+static void wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
+		   u32 val, u32 read_mask)
  {
  	struct i915_wa wa = {
  		.reg  = reg,
  		.mask = mask,
  		.val  = val,
-		.read = mask,
+		.read = read_mask,
  	};
_wa_add(wal, &wa);
  }
+static void
+__wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
+		     u32 val, u32 read_mask)
+{
+	wa_add(wal, reg, mask, val, read_mask);
+}
+
+static void
+wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
+		   u32 val)
+{
+	__wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, mask, val, mask);

Minor point - not sure about the need for this helper now, you could just call wa_add from here.

+}
+
  static void
  wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
  {
@@ -568,9 +581,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
  static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
  				     struct i915_wa_list *wal)
  {
+	u32 val;
+
  	/* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
  	WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
  			  GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
+
+	/* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
+	val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
+	val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
+	val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
+	 * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which enables
+	 * the read of FF_MODE2.
+	 */
+	__wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val, 0);

If I was a betting man I'd bet no one will ever remember to add the verification back. So I have to say I disagree with Lucas on this point. Someone do a casting vote please. :)

We know it will remain broken until at least after B0?

  }
static void
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 94d0f593eeb7..a99fdf8ea53b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -7922,6 +7922,10 @@ enum {
  #define   PIXEL_ROUNDING_TRUNC_FB_PASSTHRU 	(1 << 15)
  #define   PER_PIXEL_ALPHA_BYPASS_EN		(1 << 7)
+#define FF_MODE2 _MMIO(0x6604)
+#define   FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK	REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
+#define   FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128	REG_FIELD_PREP(FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, 4)
+
  /* PCH */
#define PCH_DISPLAY_BASE 0xc0000u


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux