Hi Stuart,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 11:04:59 PM CET Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 17:14 +0000, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 17:44 +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > As we've agreed that using I915_GEM_PREAD/PWRITE IOCTLs on dma-buf
> > > objects doesn't make much sense, we are not going to extend their
> > > handlers in the i915 driver with new processing paths required for
> > > them
> > > to work correctly with dma-buf objects on future hardware with no
> > > mappable aperture. When running on that kind of hardware, just
> > > skip
> > > subtests which use those IOCTLs.
> >
> > How is this handled for other dma-buf capable devices? Is there no
> > opportunity for a working solution in i915 here?
> >
> > Also, is this a permanent limitation? Or just a workaround based on
> > our
> > current implementation?
>
> Thinking a bit more about this, I think my main concern here is around
> the commit message. You are implying there is no chance we can
I think my commit message doesn't imply we can't, it says that there is no
need to ...
> change
> these DRM interfaces to work with dma-buf by referencing an I915 IOCTL.
because that interface is not useful.
> I don't personally have any issue adding the skip below, and honestly
> that seems like a good safeguard. But can you update the commit message
> to indicate that this is simply that, a safeguard, and not because we
> have no option
As my commit message states, we are not going ...
> to make this work from the kernel side?
even if we have an option, simply because there are no users of such
interface.
Thanks,
Janusz
> Of course please correct me if I'm mistaken here.
>
> Thanks,
> Stuart
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stuart
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <
> > > janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > lib/ioctl_wrappers.c | 2 +-
> > > lib/ioctl_wrappers.h | 1 +
> > > tests/prime_vgem.c | 6 ++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> > > index 628f8b83..78b92bd2 100644
> > > --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> > > +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> > > @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ void gem_write(int fd, uint32_t handle,
> > > uint64_t
> > > offset, const void *buf, uint64
> > > igt_assert_eq(__gem_write(fd, handle, offset, buf, length), 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int __gem_read(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset,
> > > void
> > > *buf, uint64_t length)
> > > +int __gem_read(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, void
> > > *buf,
> > > uint64_t length)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_pread gem_pread;
> > > int err;
> > > diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> > > index f2412d78..97f278ed 100644
> > > --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> > > +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ uint32_t gem_open(int fd, uint32_t name);
> > > void gem_close(int fd, uint32_t handle);
> > > int __gem_write(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, const
> > > void
> > > *buf, uint64_t length);
> > > void gem_write(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, const
> > > void
> > > *buf, uint64_t length);
> > > +int __gem_read(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, void
> > > *buf,
> > > uint64_t length);
> > > void gem_read(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, void *buf,
> > > uint64_t length);
> > > int __gem_set_domain(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t read,
> > > uint32_t write);
> > > void gem_set_domain(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t read,
> > > uint32_t
> > > write);
> > > diff --git a/tests/prime_vgem.c b/tests/prime_vgem.c
> > > index 04cc913d..6595818c 100644
> > > --- a/tests/prime_vgem.c
> > > +++ b/tests/prime_vgem.c
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static void test_read(int vgem, int i915)
> > > handle = prime_fd_to_handle(i915, dmabuf);
> > > close(dmabuf);
> > >
> > > + igt_skip_on(__gem_read(i915, handle, 0, &i, sizeof(i)));
> > > +
> > > ptr = vgem_mmap(vgem, &scratch, PROT_WRITE);
> > > for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
> > > ptr[1024*i] = i;
> > > @@ -81,6 +83,8 @@ static void test_fence_read(int i915, int vgem)
> > > handle = prime_fd_to_handle(i915, dmabuf);
> > > close(dmabuf);
> > >
> > > + igt_skip_on(__gem_read(i915, handle, 0, &i, sizeof(i)));
> > > +
> > > igt_fork(child, 1) {
> > > close(master[0]);
> > > close(slave[1]);
> > > @@ -191,6 +195,8 @@ static void test_write(int vgem, int i915)
> > > handle = prime_fd_to_handle(i915, dmabuf);
> > > close(dmabuf);
> > >
> > > + igt_skip_on(__gem_write(i915, handle, 0, &i, sizeof(i)));
> > > +
> > > ptr = vgem_mmap(vgem, &scratch, PROT_READ);
> > > gem_close(vgem, scratch.handle);
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
