On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:03:39AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > Also, see the other conversations we are having about a "virtual" bus > > and devices. I do not want to have two different ways of doing the same > > thing in the kernel at the same time please. Please work together with > > the Intel developers to solve this in a unified way, as you both > > need/want the same thing here. > > Sure, some functions looks similar, but the "virtual" bus does not contain a > management interface and it's not clear that how it can be used by userspace > driver. For this series, sysfs/GUID based management interface is reused and > we had a concrete example of how it would be used by userspace driver[1] and > a real hardware driver implementation[2]. The lifecycle stuff should be re-used through a library of this guid stuff, not by 'subclassing' mdev_device Jason _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
