Re: Failed cherry-picks on drm-intel-fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-11-18 17:39:55)
> Hi Chris,
> 
> 2 fixes failed on this cherry-pick round.
> 
> 8eb4704b124c ("drm/i915: Protect request peeking with RCU")
> 3cac195875ef ("drm/i915: Leave the aliasing-ppgtt size alone")
> 
> The second is strange because git complain about the
> empty commit.
> 
> Anyway, if any is needed could you please provide those
> through your ickle/dif please?
> 
> Also looking there I noticed one commit pending:
> 
> drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree
> 
> It seems that we do need that, but I wonder why dim is not getting
> itself. Also it conflicts on top of current drm-intel-fixes so
> I'd need a rebased version anyway please!

That one is for dinf, we only need it for the lockdep commit in the next
merge window when we will get angry looks for abusing mutexes.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux