On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 08:55:46PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> To align with link compliance design existing intel_dp_compliance
> tool will be used to get the phy request in userspace through uevent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
I would prefer splitting this patch since sending a uevent is more related
to the PHY test prep handling and debugfs handling can all be in a separate
patch.
I prefer this because debugfs nodes might need to change in the future based
on more requirements or testing feedback so its better for that to be in separate
patch.
you could add the hotplug event sending part to the prep patch (3/7) and mention that
in the commit message
Debugfs part looks good to me. Have you tested the debugfs nodes and validated if this
information is being written in the correct form?
After the split and validation of debugs nodes:
Acked-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
Manasi
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 338d3744c5d5..a2b860cf3b93 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5288,8 +5288,10 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> intel_psr_short_pulse(intel_dp);
>
> - if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Compliance Test requested\n");
> + if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING ||
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==
> + DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Compliance Test requested\n");
> /* Send a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(&dev_priv->drm);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index cab632791f73..e8b1a8c1015a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3212,6 +3212,16 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> intel_dp->compliance.test_data.vdisplay);
> seq_printf(m, "bpc: %u\n",
> intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc);
> + } else if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==
> + DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN) {
> + seq_printf(m, "pattern: %d\n",
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.phy_pattern);
> + seq_printf(m, "Number of lanes: %d\n",
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.num_lanes);
> + seq_printf(m, "Link Rate: %d\n",
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.link_rate);
> + seq_printf(m, "level: %02x\n",
> + intel_dp->train_set[0]);
> }
> } else
> seq_puts(m, "0");
> --
> 2.22.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
