On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 09:16 -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:45:00PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > PSR2 HW only support a limited number of bits per pixel, if mode
> > has
> > more than supported PSR2 should not be enabled.
> >
> > BSpec: 50422
> > BSpec: 7713
> > Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index c1d133362b76..0d84ea28bc6f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > int crtc_hdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
> > int crtc_vdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
> > - int psr_max_h = 0, psr_max_v = 0;
> > + int psr_max_h = 0, psr_max_v = 0, max_bpp = 0;
> >
> > if (!dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support)
> > return false;
> > @@ -632,12 +632,15 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > psr_max_h = 5120;
> > psr_max_v = 3200;
> > + max_bpp = 30;
> > } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 ||
> > IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > psr_max_h = 4096;
> > psr_max_v = 2304;
> > + max_bpp = 24;
> > } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> > psr_max_h = 3640;
> > psr_max_v = 2304;
> > + max_bpp = 24;
> > }
> >
> > if (crtc_hdisplay > psr_max_h || crtc_vdisplay > psr_max_v) {
> > @@ -647,6 +650,12 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > + if (crtc_state->pipe_bpp > max_bpp) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, pipe bpp %d > max
> > supported %d\n",
> > + crtc_state->pipe_bpp, max_bpp);
> > + return false;
> > + }
>
> The wording of the bspec is "PSR2 is limited to 30bpp 10:10:10" and
> "PSR2 is limited to 24bpp 8:8:8" --- that wording makes it sound like
> you need to use that one specific mode rather than it being an upper
> limit? I.e., do we need an == test here rather than >?
It works with lower than the limit:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7312/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_psr2_su@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7309/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic.html
But I agree with you, BSpec should have "limited up to Xbpp", going toopen a issue.
>
>
> Matt
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * HW sends SU blocks of size four scan lines, which means the
> > starting
> > * X coordinate and Y granularity requirements will always be
> > met. We
> > --
> > 2.24.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
