On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:22 -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:30:37PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > According to BSpec 53998, we should try to
> > restrict qgv points, which can't provide
> > enough bandwidth for desired display configuration.
> >
> > Currently we are just comparing against all of
> > those and take minimum(worst case).
> >
> > v2: Fixed wrong PCode reply mask, removed hardcoded
> > values.
> >
> > v3: Forbid simultaneous legacy SAGV PCode requests and
> > restricting qgv points. Put the actual restriction
> > to commit function, added serialization(thanks to Ville)
> > to prevent commit being applied out of order in case of
> > nonblocking and/or nomodeset commits.
> >
> > v4:
> > - Minor code refactoring, fixed few typos(thanks to James
> > Ausmus)
> > - Change the naming of qgv point
> > masking/unmasking functions(James Ausmus).
> > - Simplify the masking/unmasking operation itself,
> > as we don't need to mask only single point per request(James
> > Ausmus)
> > - Reject and stick to highest bandwidth point if SAGV
> > can't be enabled(BSpec)
> >
> > v5:
> > - Add new mailbox reply codes, which seems to happen during
> > boot
> > time for TGL and indicate that QGV setting is not yet
> > available.
> >
> > v6:
> > - Increase number of supported QGV points to be in sync with
> > BSpec.
> >
> > v7: - Rebased and resolved conflict to fix build failure.
> > - Fix NUM_QGV_POINTS to 8 and moved that to header file(James
> > Ausmus)
> >
> > v8: - Don't report an error if we can't restrict qgv points, as
> > SAGV
> > can be disabled by BIOS, which is completely legal. So don't
> > make CI panic. Instead if we detect that there is only 1 QGV
> > point accessible just analyze if we can fit the required
> > bandwidth
> > requirements, but no need in restricting.
> >
> > v9: - Fix wrong QGV transition if we have 0 planes and no SAGV
> > simultaneously.
> >
> > v10: - Fix CDCLK corruption, because of global state getting
> > serialized
> > without modeset, which caused copying of non-calculated
> > cdclk
> > to be copied to dev_priv(thanks to Ville for the hint).
> >
> > Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.h | 3 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 137
> > +++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 104 ++++++++++++-
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 3 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 27 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h | 1 -
> > 11 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.h
> > index 7b49623419ba..3ab6d7ec75ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #define __INTEL_ATOMIC_H__
> >
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include "intel_display_types.h"
>
> Is this change needed? We already have a forward declaration of
> intel_atomic_state so it doesn't seem like this should be necessary
> for
> the function prototype below.
Good point I will check if it will build without this.
>
> > const struct intel_sa_info *sa)
> > {
> > - struct intel_qgv_info qi = {};
> > + struct intel_qgv_info qi;
>
> Is there a reason we don't want to zero out the structure here? I
> don't
> think it should hurt anything, plus it helps prevent us from making
> mistakes in the future and trying to interpret garbage data
> associated
> with the non-existent QGV points.
I was actually planning to store it in dev_priv but then found another
way to access number of qgv points, through another structure already
stored there, then put it back, so thanks for spotting.
>
> > bool is_y_tile = true; /* assume y tile may be used */
> > int num_channels;
> > int deinterleave;
> > @@ -270,22 +294,6 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> > icl_get_bw_info(dev_priv, &icl_sa_info);
> > }
> >
> > -static unsigned int intel_max_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > - int num_planes)
> > -{
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > - /*
> > - * FIXME with SAGV disabled maybe we can assume
> > - * point 1 will always be used? Seems to match
> > - * the behaviour observed in the wild.
> > - */
> > - return min3(icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 0),
> > - icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 1),
> > - icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, 2));
> > - else
> > - return UINT_MAX;
> > -}
> > -
> > static unsigned int intel_bw_crtc_num_active_planes(const struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > {
> > /*
> > @@ -377,7 +385,12 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > unsigned int data_rate, max_data_rate;
> > unsigned int num_active_planes;
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, ret;
> > + struct intel_qgv_info qi = {};
> > + u32 allowed_points = 0;
> > + unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
> > + unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv-
> > >max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> > + u32 mask = (1 << num_qgv_points) - 1;
> >
> > /* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */
> > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> > @@ -421,16 +434,92 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, bw_state);
> > num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv,
> > bw_state);
> >
> > - max_data_rate = intel_max_data_rate(dev_priv,
> > num_active_planes);
> > -
> > data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000);
> >
> > - if (data_rate > max_data_rate) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Bandwidth %u MB/s exceeds max available
> > %d MB/s (%d active planes)\n",
> > - data_rate, max_data_rate,
> > num_active_planes);
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) {
> > + max_data_rate = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_active_planes,
> > i);
> > + /*
> > + * We need to know which qgv point gives us
> > + * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV
> > + * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time
> > + * with watermarks. By that moment we already
> > + * have those, as it is calculated earlier in
> > + * intel_atomic_check,
> > + */
> > + if (max_data_rate > max_bw) {
> > + max_bw_point = i;
> > + max_bw = max_data_rate;
> > + }
> > + if (max_data_rate >= data_rate)
> > + allowed_points |= 1 << i;
>
> Minor nitpick; cleaner to use BIT(i) for this.
>
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("QGV point %d: max bw %d required %d\n",
> > + i, max_data_rate, data_rate);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * BSpec states that we always should have at least one allowed
> > point
> > + * left, so if we couldn't - simply reject the configuration
> > for obvious
> > + * reasons.
> > + */
> > + if (allowed_points == 0) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not find any suitable QGV
> > points\n");
>
> We might want to make some mention of memory bandwidth in this
> message
> for people who don't know what a QGV point is. E.g., "No QGV points
> provide sufficient memory bandwidth for display configuration."
>
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * In case if SAGV is disabled in BIOS, we always get 1
> > + * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it
> > + * as it will fail and pointless anyway.
> > + */
> > + if (qi.num_points == 1)
> > + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> > + else
> > + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Leave only single point with highest bandwidth, if
> > + * we can't enable SAGV according to BSpec.
> > + */
> > + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state)) {
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * This is a border line condition when we have 0
> > planes
> > + * and SAGV not enabled means that we should keep QGV
> > with
> > + * highest bandwidth, however algorithm returns wrong
> > result
> > + * for 0 planes and 0 data rate, so just stick to last
> > config
> > + * then. Otherwise use the QGV point with highest BW
> > according
> > + * to BSpec.
> > + */
>
> Isn't the QGV with the highest bandwidth constant? Can we just
> figure
> it out once at startup and then set it directly here instead of
> re-finding it each commit?
It seems to be constant however there is a mentioning in BSpec
something like
"there are cases when higher point allows less bandwidth than lower",
as I understand depending on contraints, the algorithm itself might
change, so I preferred not to rely on that we know which point provides
highest bandwidth but just calculate it. We could of course figure it
out only once, however not sure if something else won't ever change and
affect that. Iterating through few points doesn't seem to be too hard
anyway.
>
> > + if (!data_rate && !num_active_planes) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV, using old QGV mask\n");
> > + allowed_points = (~dev_priv->qgv_points_mask) &
> > mask;
> > + } else {
> > + allowed_points = 1 << max_bw_point;
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV, using single QGV point
> > %d\n",
> > + max_bw_point);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * We store the ones which need to be masked as that is what
> > PCode
> > + * actually accepts as a parameter.
> > + */
> > + state->qgv_points_mask = (~allowed_points) & mask;
> > +
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("New state %p qgv mask %x\n",
> > + state, state->qgv_points_mask);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that
> > + * the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset,
> > nonblocking)
> > + */
> > + if (state->qgv_points_mask != dev_priv->qgv_points_mask) {
> > + ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(state);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not serialize global
> > state\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > index 9db10af012f4..66bf9bc10b73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > @@ -28,5 +28,7 @@ int intel_bw_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv);
> > int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> > void intel_bw_crtc_update(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> > const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > +int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > + u32 points_mask);
> >
> > #endif /* __INTEL_BW_H__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 7ea1e7518ab6..71f6aaa1f6b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -14744,6 +14744,80 @@ static void
> > intel_atomic_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > intel_atomic_helper_free_state(i915);
> > }
> >
> > +static void intel_qgv_points_mask(struct intel_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 new_mask = dev_priv->qgv_points_mask | state-
> > >qgv_points_mask;
> > + unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv-
> > >max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> > + unsigned int mask = (1 << num_qgv_points) - 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As we don't know initial hardware state during initial
> > commit
> > + * we should not do anything, until we actually figure out,
> > + * what are the qgv points to mask.
> > + */
> > + if (!new_mask)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(new_mask == mask);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
> > + */
> > + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Restrict required qgv points before updating the
> > configuration.
> > + * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at
> > the same
> > + * time. Also masking should be done before updating the
> > configuration
> > + * and unmasking afterwards.
> > + */
> > + ret = icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not restrict required qgv
> > points(%d)\n",
> > + ret);
> > + else
> > + dev_priv->qgv_points_mask = new_mask;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void intel_qgv_points_unmask(struct intel_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 new_mask = dev_priv->qgv_points_mask & state-
> > >qgv_points_mask;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As we don't know initial hardware state during initial
> > commit
> > + * we should not do anything, until we actually figure out,
> > + * what are the qgv points to mask.
> > + */
> > + if (!new_mask)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
> > + */
> > + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Allow required qgv points after updating the configuration.
> > + * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at
> > the same
> > + * time. Also masking should be done before updating the
> > configuration
> > + * and unmasking afterwards.
> > + */
> > + ret = icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not restrict required qgv
> > points(%d)\n",
> > + ret);
> > + else
> > + dev_priv->qgv_points_mask = new_mask;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > {
> > struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > @@ -14771,6 +14845,9 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11))
> > + intel_qgv_points_mask(state);
> > +
> > intel_commit_modeset_disables(state);
> >
> > /* FIXME: Eventually get rid of our crtc->config pointer */
> > @@ -14789,8 +14866,9 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV
> > when we
> > * have more then one pipe enabled
> > */
> > - if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > - intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> > + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > + intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> >
> > intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev_priv, state);
> > }
> > @@ -14873,8 +14951,11 @@ static void
> > intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > if (state->modeset)
> > intel_verify_planes(state);
> >
> > - if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > - intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > + if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > + intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > + } else
> > + intel_qgv_points_unmask(state);
> >
> > drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(&state->base);
> >
> > @@ -14962,7 +15043,18 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct
> > drm_device *dev,
> > {
> > struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> > to_intel_atomic_state(_state);
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > - int ret = 0;
> > + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
> > + int ret = 0, i;
> > + bool any_ms = false;
> > + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > +
> > + for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > old_crtc_state,
> > + new_crtc_state, i) {
> > + if (needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)) {
> > + any_ms = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> I think we already have this in state->modeset.
>
> >
> > state->wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> >
> > @@ -15021,7 +15113,7 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct
> > drm_device *dev,
> > intel_shared_dpll_swap_state(state);
> > intel_atomic_track_fbs(state);
> >
> > - if (state->global_state_changed) {
> > + if (state->global_state_changed && any_ms) {
> > assert_global_state_locked(dev_priv);
> >
> > memcpy(dev_priv->min_cdclk, state->min_cdclk,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index fb274538af23..896b13bc4494 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -528,6 +528,9 @@ struct intel_atomic_state {
> > struct i915_sw_fence commit_ready;
> >
> > struct llist_node freed;
> > +
> > + /* Gen11+ only */
> > + u32 qgv_points_mask;
> > };
> >
> > struct intel_plane_state {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 4f4e2e839513..9924390cb94b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1243,11 +1243,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> > } dram_info;
> >
> > struct intel_bw_info {
> > - unsigned int deratedbw[3]; /* for each QGV point */
> > + unsigned int deratedbw[NUM_SAGV_POINTS]; /* for each
> > QGV point */
> > u8 num_qgv_points;
> > u8 num_planes;
> > } max_bw[6];
> >
> > + u32 qgv_points_mask;
> > +
> > struct drm_private_obj bw_obj;
> >
> > struct intel_runtime_pm runtime_pm;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index a607ea520829..6d6ecf1d9f6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -8951,6 +8951,9 @@ enum {
> > #define VLV_RENDER_C0_COUNT _MMIO(0x138118)
> > #define VLV_MEDIA_C0_COUNT _MMIO(0x13811C)
> >
> > +/* BSpec precisely defines this */
> > +#define NUM_SAGV_POINTS 8
> > +
>
> Any specific reason this is in the reg file rather than either
> i915_drv.h where it's used or something like intel_bw.h?
Probably none. I can look for a better place for this.
>
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_MAILBOX _MMIO(0x138124)
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_READY (1 << 31)
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_ERROR_MASK 0xFF
> > @@ -8961,6 +8964,8 @@ enum {
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_UNIMPLEMENTED_CMD 0xFF
> > #define GEN7_PCODE_TIMEOUT 0x2
> > #define GEN7_PCODE_ILLEGAL_DATA 0x3
> > +#define GEN11_PCODE_MAIL_BOX_LOCKED 0x6
> > +#define GEN11_PCODE_REJECTED 0x11
> > #define GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE 0x10
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_WRITE_RC6VIDS 0x4
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_READ_RC6VIDS 0x5
> > @@ -8982,6 +8987,7 @@ enum {
> > #define ICL_PCODE_MEM_SUBSYSYSTEM_INFO 0xd
> > #define ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO (0x0 << 8)
> > #define ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_QGV_POINT_INFO(point) (((poin
> > t) << 16) | (0x1 << 8))
> > +#define ICL_PCODE_SAGV_DE_MEM_SS_CONFIG 0xe
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_READ_D_COMP 0x10
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_WRITE_D_COMP 0x11
> > #define HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ 0x17
> > @@ -8994,6 +9000,8 @@ enum {
> > #define GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED 0x1
> > #define GEN9_SAGV_ENABLE 0x3
> > #define GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US 0x23
> > +#define GEN11_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED 0x0
> > +#define GEN11_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED_MASK 0x1
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA _MMIO(0x138128)
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT 8
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT 16
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index c792dd168742..10816f3e29f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3617,13 +3617,9 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool
> > +bool
> > intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > - /* HACK! */
> > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12))
> > - return false;
> > -
> > return (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) &&
> > dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> > }
> > @@ -3839,7 +3835,7 @@ static void icl_set_sagv_mask(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > if (flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (!new_crtc_state->base.active)
> > + if (!new_crtc_state->hw.enable)
> > continue;
>
> Looks like this was a bug in the previous patch. Any specific reason
> we're switching from active to enable?
Yees, we discussed that with Ville, there are seems to be some
confusion about when to use active or enable. In intel_pm many
functions were using enable so I simply followed same approach, as
I understood in theory we should use "active" here, however there were
recent changes, separating hw state and uapi which probably confused me
into using this again.
>
> >
> > can_sagv = true;
> > @@ -3886,6 +3882,9 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > else
> > skl_set_sagv_mask(state);
> >
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Crtc sagv masks, state %x global state %x\n",
> > + state->crtc_sagv_mask,
> > + dev_priv->crtc_sagv_mask);
> > /*
> > * For SAGV we need to account all the pipes,
> > * not only the ones which are in state currently.
> > @@ -4340,7 +4339,7 @@ static int
> > tgl_check_pipe_fits_sagv_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> > {
> > - struct drm_crtc *crtc = crtc_state->base.crtc;
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;
>
> Also a bug in the previous patch.
>
>
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc = &crtc_state->wm.skl.ddb;
> > @@ -4833,7 +4832,6 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state-
> > >uapi.crtc->dev);
> > - u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>
> Mentioned on previous patch.
>
>
> > uint_fixed_16_16_t method1, method2;
> > uint_fixed_16_16_t selected_result;
> > u32 res_blocks, res_lines, min_ddb_alloc = 0;
> > @@ -5707,6 +5705,7 @@ static void tgl_set_sagv_mask(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > ret = tgl_check_pipe_fits_sagv_wm(new_crtc_state, ddb);
> > if (!ret) {
> > int pipe_bit = BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > +
> > state->crtc_sagv_mask |= pipe_bit;
>
> Unrelated change.
>
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > index b579c724b915..53275860731a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc
> > *crtc,
> > void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void vlv_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> > +bool intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > int intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > bool skl_wm_level_equals(const struct skl_wm_level *l1,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> > index e06b35b844a0..ff9dbed094d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> > @@ -371,6 +371,29 @@ static inline int
> > gen7_check_mailbox_status(u32 mbox)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int gen11_check_mailbox_status(u32 mbox)
> > +{
> > + switch (mbox & GEN6_PCODE_ERROR_MASK) {
> > + case GEN6_PCODE_SUCCESS:
> > + return 0;
> > + case GEN6_PCODE_ILLEGAL_CMD:
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + case GEN7_PCODE_TIMEOUT:
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + case GEN7_PCODE_ILLEGAL_DATA:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + case GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE:
> > + return -EOVERFLOW;
> > + case GEN11_PCODE_MAIL_BOX_LOCKED:
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + case GEN11_PCODE_REJECTED:
> > + return -EACCES;
> > + default:
> > + MISSING_CASE(mbox & GEN6_PCODE_ERROR_MASK);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __sandybridge_pcode_rw(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > u32 mbox, u32 *val, u32 *val1,
> > int fast_timeout_us,
> > @@ -408,7 +431,9 @@ static int __sandybridge_pcode_rw(struct
> > drm_i915_private *i915,
> > if (is_read && val1)
> > *val1 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, GEN6_PCODE_DATA1);
> >
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(i915) > 6)
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11)
> > + return gen11_check_mailbox_status(mbox);
> > + else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) > 6)
> > return gen7_check_mailbox_status(mbox);
> > else
> > return gen6_check_mailbox_status(mbox);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> > index 7fb95745a444..14627ace99ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
> > @@ -137,5 +137,4 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct
> > drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
> >
> > int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32
> > request,
> > u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
> > -
> > #endif /* _INTEL_SIDEBAND_H */
>
> Unrelated change.
>
>
> In general, I wonder if we could break this patch up a bit more. It
> seems like there are a lot of moving pieces here which makes it a bit
> harder to review.
Sounds like good idea, we seem to need a fix for static QGV array
warning which we get for tgl, so I will probably try to split out
that part with some preparation stuff to make this at least look
less complex.
- Stan
>
>
> Matt
>
>
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
