Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Be consistent in our mocs setup on Tigerlake and set the unused control > value to follow the PTE entry as we previously have done. The unused > values are beyond the defines of the ABI, the consistency simplifies our > checking. Simplifies how? > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c > index 6e881c735b20..d2b445d6c258 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c > @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt) > for (; index < table.n_entries; index++) > intel_uncore_write(uncore, > GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index), > - table.table[0].control_value); > + table.table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value); This sets it point into reserved, so I am confused. Also the comment above and the part in generic MOCS tables will be stale. -Mika > } > > void intel_mocs_init(struct intel_gt *gt) > -- > 2.24.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
