Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On gen7, including Haswell, the MI_FLUSH_DW command is not synchronous > with the command streamer nor is there an option to make it so. To hide > this we add a large delay on the CS so that the breadcrumb should always > be visible before the interrupt. However, that does not seem to be > enough to ensure the memory is actually coherent with the read of the > breadcrumb. The breadcrumb update is a post-sync op... Throw in a > preliminary MI_FLUSH_DW before the breadcrumb update in the hope that > helps. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112147 If we are not sure, References > Testcase: igt/i915_selftest/live_blt > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c > index a47d5a7c32c9..fc29df712810 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c > @@ -454,6 +454,10 @@ static u32 *gen7_xcs_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs) > GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_ggtt != rq->engine->status_page.vma); > GEM_BUG_ON(offset_in_page(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_offset) != I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR); > > + *cs++ = MI_FLUSH_DW; > + *cs++ = 0; > + *cs++ = 0; I see this as wmb wrt seqno write. Massive hammer would be to include timestamp write in here with tlb flush? But one can always hope. > + > *cs++ = MI_FLUSH_DW | MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW | MI_FLUSH_DW_STORE_INDEX; > *cs++ = I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR | MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT; > *cs++ = rq->fence.seqno; > @@ -469,7 +473,6 @@ static u32 *gen7_xcs_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs) > *cs++ = 0; > > *cs++ = MI_USER_INTERRUPT; > - *cs++ = MI_NOOP; Evens, Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > rq->tail = intel_ring_offset(rq, cs); > assert_ring_tail_valid(rq->ring, rq->tail); > -- > 2.24.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx