Quoting Jani Nikula (2019-10-29 12:51:55)
> Add convenience helpers for the most common uncore operations with
> struct drm_i915_private * as context rather than struct intel_uncore *.
>
> The goal is to replace all instances of I915_READ(),
> I915_POSTING_READ(), and I915_WRITE() in display/ with these, to finally
> be able to get rid of the implicit dev_priv local parameter use.
>
> The idea is that any non-u32 reads or writes are special enough that
> they can use the intel_uncore_* functions directly.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
<SNIP>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_uncore.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __INTEL_DISPLAY_UNCORE_H__
> +#define __INTEL_DISPLAY_UNCORE_H__
intel_de_uncore.c/.h for easier finding?
> +
> +#include "i915_drv.h"
> +#include "i915_reg.h"
> +#include "intel_uncore.h"
> +
> +static inline u32 intel_de_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg)
I think it'd be good a opportunity to pass struct intel_de{,_uncore}
as a parameter, and start grouping DE stuff underneath it?
It'll of course be much bigger change.
Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
