Flushing the outer i915_active is not enough, as we need the barrier to be applied across all the active dma_fence callbacks. So we must serialise with each outstanding fence. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- .../drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c index e864406bd2d9..f665a0e23c61 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c @@ -53,9 +53,7 @@ static struct pulse *pulse_create(void) static void pulse_unlock_wait(struct pulse *p) { - mutex_lock(&p->active.mutex); - mutex_unlock(&p->active.mutex); - flush_work(&p->active.work); + i915_active_unlock_wait(&p->active); } static int __live_idle_pulse(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h index 44859356ce97..5dd62323b92a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h @@ -215,5 +215,6 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref); void i915_request_add_active_barriers(struct i915_request *rq); void i915_active_print(struct i915_active *ref, struct drm_printer *m); +void i915_active_unlock_wait(struct i915_active *ref); #endif /* _I915_ACTIVE_H_ */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c index 260b0ee5d1e3..675e93610676 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c @@ -250,3 +250,36 @@ void i915_active_print(struct i915_active *ref, struct drm_printer *m) i915_active_release(ref); } } + +static void spin_unlock_wait(spinlock_t *lock) +{ + spin_lock_irq(lock); + spin_unlock_irq(lock); +} + +void i915_active_unlock_wait(struct i915_active *ref) +{ + if (i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref)) { + struct active_node *it, *n; + + rcu_read_lock(); + rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(it, n, &ref->tree, node) { + struct dma_fence *f; + + /* Wait for all active callbacks */ + f = rcu_dereference(it->base.fence); + if (f) + spin_unlock_wait(f->lock); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + i915_active_release(ref); + } + + /* And wait for the retire callback */ + mutex_lock(&ref->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex); + + /* ... which may have been on a thread instead */ + flush_work(&p->active.work); +} -- 2.24.0.rc2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
