Quoting Andi Shyti (2019-10-23 13:32:16) > > > * maximum clocks following a vblank miss (see do_rps_boost()). > > > */ > > > if (!intel_state->rps_interactive) { > > > - intel_rps_mark_interactive(dev_priv, true); > > > + intel_rps_mark_interactive(&dev_priv->gt.rps, true); > > > > I wonder if we can do &plane->vma->vm->gt->rps > > agree, looks ugly, I could fix it by extracting rps. Shall I do > it now in a v3 or after the patch gets merged? As you can gues > I'd prefer doing after the patch is merged :) Mostly thinking aloud. I plan on soak testing this first; something did not look quite right around pm_enable/pm_disable vs gt_resume/gt_suspend (i.e. did not match my current expectations of where to push the gt init next). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx