Hi Chris, On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:13:02 AM CEST Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-23 10:07:52) > > From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > The basic-range subtest assumes 4kB minimum batch size. On future > > backends with possibly bigger minimum batch sizes this subtest will > > fail as buffer objects may overlap. To avoid object overlapping, > > offsets need to be calculated with actual minimum batch size in mind. > > > > Replace hardcoded constants corresponding to the assumed 4kB minimum > > batch size with values calculated from a variable supposed to represent > > actual batch size. For now, the variable is still initialized with the > > 4kB value, suitable for backends currently supported by IGT. > > You could do this entirely within the reloc API, no? By probing whether > a 4KiB offset is legal? Thanks for the hint, I'll try to take this path. Janusz > -Chris > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
