Op 17-10-2019 om 15:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:20:52PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Instead of unconditionally verifying the cursor plane, handle it in the >> same way as any other plane, and use our existing api to verify. >> >> While at it, ensure that on gen9+ we verify active_planes mask as well. >> This should give the correct results for planar YUV planes too, as we >> update active_planes for them. > Why is that hidden in the watermark verification code? We already have > intel_verify_planes() which seems like a better fit. Wasn't aware of it, mostly. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
