On 16/10/2019 12:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
The guc selftests are hardware^W firmare centric and so want to use the
Typo in firmware.
gt as its target.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c | 42 ++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
index f927f851aadf..d8a80388bd31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
@@ -108,22 +108,15 @@ static bool client_doorbell_in_sync(struct intel_guc_client *client)
* validating that the doorbells status expected by the driver matches what the
* GuC/HW have.
*/
-static int igt_guc_clients(void *args)
+static int igt_guc_clients(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = args;
+ struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
+ struct intel_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
- struct intel_guc *guc;
int err = 0;
- GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(dev_priv));
- wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
-
- guc = &dev_priv->gt.uc.guc;
- if (!guc) {
- pr_err("No guc object!\n");
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto unlock;
- }
Must be some refactor caught someone of guard. :)
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(gt->i915));
+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(gt->uncore->rpm);
err = check_all_doorbells(guc);
if (err)
@@ -188,7 +181,7 @@ static int igt_guc_clients(void *args)
guc_clients_create(guc);
guc_clients_enable(guc);
unlock:
- intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref);
return err;
}
@@ -199,21 +192,14 @@ static int igt_guc_clients(void *args)
*/
static int igt_guc_doorbells(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = arg;
+ struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
+ struct intel_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
- struct intel_guc *guc;
int i, err = 0;
u16 db_id;
- GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(dev_priv));
- wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
-
- guc = &dev_priv->gt.uc.guc;
- if (!guc) {
- pr_err("No guc object!\n");
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(gt->i915));
+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(gt->uncore->rpm);
err = check_all_doorbells(guc);
if (err)
@@ -295,19 +281,19 @@ static int igt_guc_doorbells(void *arg)
guc_client_free(clients[i]);
}
unlock:
- intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref);
return err;
}
-int intel_guc_live_selftest(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+int intel_guc_live_selftest(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
SUBTEST(igt_guc_clients),
SUBTEST(igt_guc_doorbells),
};
- if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv))
+ if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915))
return 0;
- return i915_subtests(tests, dev_priv);
+ return intel_gt_live_subtests(tests, &i915->gt);
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx