On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:53:59 +0800 Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for > structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to > 'specific', so now we have export/internal/specific directives to limit > the functions/types to be included in documentation. Meanwhile we improved > the warning message. I agree with the others that "specific" doesn't really make things better. "Interfaces" maybe; otherwise we could go for something like "filter" or "select". Paint mine green :) Whatever we end up with, I think it should be added as a synonym for "functions". Then the various selectors that are actually pulling out docs for functions could be changed at leisure - or not at all. I'd rather not see a big patch changing everything at once. Thanks, jon _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
