Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/perf: Allow dynamic reconfiguration of the OA stream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2019 00:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>

Introduce a new perf_ioctl command to change the OA configuration of the
active stream. This allows the OA stream to be reconfigured between
batch buffers, giving greater flexibility in sampling. We inject a
request into the OA context to reconfigure the stream asynchronously on
the GPU in between and ordered with execbuffer calls.

Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>


So much simpler :)


---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h      | 10 ++++++++++
  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 12cc47aece21..3b77db8995f3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -2856,6 +2856,28 @@ static void i915_perf_disable_locked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
  		stream->ops->disable(stream);
  }
+static int i915_perf_config_locked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
+				   unsigned long metrics_set)
+{
+	struct i915_oa_config *config;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	config = i915_perf_get_oa_config(stream->perf, metrics_set);
+	if (!config)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (config != stream->oa_config) {
+		if (stream->pinned_ctx)
+			err = emit_oa_config(stream, stream->pinned_ctx);
+		if (err == 0)
+			config = xchg(&stream->oa_config, config);
+	}
+
+	i915_oa_config_put(config);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
  /**
   * i915_perf_ioctl - support ioctl() usage with i915 perf stream FDs
   * @stream: An i915 perf stream
@@ -2879,6 +2901,8 @@ static long i915_perf_ioctl_locked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
  	case I915_PERF_IOCTL_DISABLE:
  		i915_perf_disable_locked(stream);
  		return 0;
+	case I915_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG:
+		return i915_perf_config_locked(stream, arg);

For REMOVE_CONFIG we passed a pointer to an u64, not sure whether we should reuse the same pattern here?

I don't mind the current version.


-Lionel

  	}
return -EINVAL;
@@ -4017,7 +4041,15 @@ void i915_perf_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
   */
  int i915_perf_ioctl_version(void)
  {
-	return 1;
+	/*
+	 * 1: Initial version
+	 *   I915_PERF_IOCTL_ENABLE
+	 *   I915_PERF_IOCTL_DISABLE
+	 *
+	 * 2: Added runtime modification of OA config.
+	 *   I915_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG
+	 */
+	return 2;
  }
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
index 0c7b2815fbf1..5e66f7c60261 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -1932,6 +1932,16 @@ struct drm_i915_perf_open_param {
   */
  #define I915_PERF_IOCTL_DISABLE	_IO('i', 0x1)
+/**
+ * Change metrics_set captured by a stream.
+ *
+ * Will not take effect until the stream is restart, or upon the next
+ * execbuf when attached to a specific context.
+ *
+ * This ioctl is available in perf revision 2.
+ */
+#define I915_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG	_IO('i', 0x2)
+
  /**
   * Common to all i915 perf records
   */


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux