Re: [PATCH 3/4] [v5] drm/i915/color: Extract icl_read_luts()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09-Oct-19 7:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:25:41PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
For icl+, have hw read out to create hw blob of gamma
lut values. icl+ platforms supports multi segmented gamma
mode by default, add hw lut creation for this mode.

This will be used to validate gamma programming using dsb
(display state buffer) which is a tgl specific feature.

Major change done-removal of readouts of coarse and fine segments
because PAL_PREC_DATA register isn't giving propoer values.
State checker limited only to "fine segment"

v2: -readout code for multisegmented gamma has to come
      up with some intermediate entries that aren't preserved
      in hardware (Jani N)
     -linear interpolation (Ville)
     -moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs,
      since icl doesn't support that
v3: -use u16 instead of __u16 [Jani N]
     -used single lut [Jani N]
     -improved and more readable for loops [Jani N]
     -read values directly to actual locations and then fill gaps [Jani N]
     -moved cleaning to patch 1 [Jani N]
     -renamed icl_read_lut_multi_seg() to icl_read_lut_multi_segment to
      make it similar to icl_load_luts()
     -renamed icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_blob() to
      icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_lut_values() more sensible, I guess
v4: -removed interpolated func for creating gamma lut values
     -removed readouts of fine and coarse segments, failure to read PAL_PREC_DATA
      correctly
v5: -added gamma_enable check inside read_luts()

Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |   6 ++
  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
index fa44eb73d088..614e0ad386ca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
@@ -1477,6 +1477,25 @@ static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	}
  }
+static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
+	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
+		return 8;
+	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
+		return 10;
+	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
+		return 16;
+	default:
+		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+}
+
  int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  {
  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
@@ -1488,7 +1507,9 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
  		else
  			return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
  	} else {
-		if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
+			return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
+		else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
  			return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
  		else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
  			return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
@@ -1519,6 +1540,20 @@ static bool intel_color_lut_entry_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
  	return true;
  }
+static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
+					      struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
+					      int lut_size, u32 err)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
+		if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
  bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
  			   struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
  			   u32 gamma_mode, u32 bit_precision)
@@ -1537,16 +1572,8 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
  	lut_size2 = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
/* check sw and hw lut size */
-	switch (gamma_mode) {
-	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
-	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
-		if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
-			return false;
-		break;
-	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
-			return false;
-	}
+	if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
+		return false;
lut1 = blob1->data;
  	lut2 = blob2->data;
@@ -1554,13 +1581,18 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
  	err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
/* check sw and hw lut entry to be equal */
-	switch (gamma_mode) {
+	switch (gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
  	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
  	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
  		if (!intel_color_lut_entry_equal(lut1, lut2,
  						 lut_size2, err))
  			return false;
  		break;
+	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
+		if (!intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(lut1, lut2,
+						       lut_size2, err))

I don't think you need a new function for that. Just pass 9 as the size
to intel_color_lut_entry_equal() ?

I had made a separate function for multi-segmented gamma since there will be 3 loops for comparing superfine, fine and course segments which wont go with intel_lut_entry_equal() structure.

Right now we are limiting to superfine segment only but in future we will add for other segments too (once we get fix from h/w)

Func() should look like this. Actually there is no need to passing lut_size only in this function if we continue with this function only.

+static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
+                                             struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
+                                             int lut_size, u32 err)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       for (i = 1; i < 257; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i * 8], &lut2[i * 8], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i * 8 * 128], &lut2[i * 8 * 128], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       return true;
+}
+
Please suggest.


Hmm, should probably rename that to just intel_color_lut_equal() since
it checks the entire LUT (or at least the specified subset) and not
just a single entry...

This will be fine for this segment but for other two segments it won't work. Right?

+			return false;
+		break;
  	default:
  		MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
  			return false;
@@ -1815,6 +1847,63 @@ static void glk_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
  }
+static struct drm_property_blob *
+icl_read_lut_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+	int lut_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
+	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
+	struct drm_property_blob *blob;
+	struct drm_color_lut *blob_data;
+	u32 i, val1, val2;
+
+	blob = drm_property_create_blob(&dev_priv->drm,
+					sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * lut_size,
+					NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(blob))
+		return NULL;
+
+	blob_data = blob->data;
+
+	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
+		val1 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
+		val2 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
+
+		blob_data[i].red = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
+				   REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK, val1);
+		blob_data[i].green = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
+				     REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK, val1);
+		blob_data[i].blue = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
+				    REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK, val1);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * FIXME readouts from PAL_PREC_DATA register aren't giving correct values
+	 * in the case of fine and coarse segments. Restricting readouts only for
+	 * super fine segment as of now.
+	 */
+
+	return blob;
+}
+
+static void icl_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
+	    GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)

Please make this a switch statement.

I pushed patches 1-2 to dinq. Thanks.

+		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = i9xx_read_lut_8(crtc_state);
+	else if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
+		 GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED)
+		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = icl_read_lut_multi_segment(crtc_state);
+	else
+		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
+}
+
  void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
  {
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
@@ -1858,6 +1947,7 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
  			dev_priv->display.load_luts = icl_load_luts;
+			dev_priv->display.read_luts = icl_read_luts;
  		} else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
  			dev_priv->display.load_luts = glk_load_luts;
  			dev_priv->display.read_luts = glk_read_luts;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 1dc067fc57ab..06b6398b7d62 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -10584,6 +10584,12 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_A 0x4A40C
  #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_B	0x4AC0C
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 20)
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 14)
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 10)
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 4)
+#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
#define PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
  					_PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_A, \
--
2.23.0



--
~Swati Sharma
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux