[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: execlists->active is serialised by the tasklet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The active/pending execlists is no longer protected by the
engine->active.lock, but is serialised by the tasklet instead. Update
the locking around the debug and stats to follow suit.

Fixes: df403069029d ("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Wrap the tasklet_lock inside execlists_active_lock() to help clarify
what it is meant to be protecting.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h    | 12 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 16 +++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h           |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
index d624752f2a92..c99910c4eeb9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
@@ -136,6 +136,18 @@ execlists_active(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	return READ_ONCE(*execlists->active);
 }
 
+static inline void
+execlists_active_lock(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+	tasklet_lock(&execlists->tasklet);
+}
+
+static inline void
+execlists_active_unlock(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+	tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet);
+}
+
 struct i915_request *
 execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
index 5aa1371f6a0f..45b708fc4b52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1245,9 +1245,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 					 struct drm_printer *m)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
-	const struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists =
-		&engine->execlists;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
 	u64 addr;
 
 	if (engine->id == RENDER_CLASS && IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 4, 7))
@@ -1329,7 +1327,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 				   idx, hws[idx * 2], hws[idx * 2 + 1]);
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+		execlists_active_lock(execlists);
 		for (port = execlists->active; (rq = *port); port++) {
 			char hdr[80];
 			int len;
@@ -1367,7 +1365,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 			if (tl)
 				intel_timeline_put(tl);
 		}
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+		execlists_active_unlock(execlists);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 6) {
 		drm_printf(m, "\tPP_DIR_BASE: 0x%08x\n",
 			   ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_PP_DIR_BASE));
@@ -1509,8 +1507,8 @@ int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	if (!intel_engine_supports_stats(engine))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
-	write_seqlock(&engine->stats.lock);
+	execlists_active_lock(execlists);
+	write_seqlock_irqsave(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
 
 	if (unlikely(engine->stats.enabled == ~0)) {
 		err = -EBUSY;
@@ -1538,8 +1536,8 @@ int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	}
 
 unlock:
-	write_sequnlock(&engine->stats.lock);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
+	execlists_active_unlock(execlists);
 
 	return err;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
index 167a7b56ed5b..6795f1daa3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
@@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
 
 #define I915_GEM_IDLE_TIMEOUT (HZ / 5)
 
+static inline void tasklet_lock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+	while (!tasklet_trylock(t))
+		cpu_relax();
+}
+
 static inline void __tasklet_disable_sync_once(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&t->count))
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux