On 09/10/2019 09:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-09 07:40:54)
On 09/10/2019 02:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-09 00:14:41)
If we start reusing it for extended parameters, we need to make fences
the first extended param.
Why?
How do we pass a reconfigure of OA together with an array of fences?
They are independent extensions, you pass none, one or the other, or
both. Without the fence extension you have to choose...
I get your point, but that means the first patch that introduces the
extension mechanism should be providing the means to supply the existing
array (if it wants to remain a separate patch).
-Chris
Yeah, we should merge those 2 patches then.
-Lionel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
