On 02/10/2019 12:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
It appears we cannot consistently hit our self-imposed QoS target of 2s
for performing the reset (my theory is that is some RCU scheduling
quirk), so relax the assertion to a measly 10s.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105957
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_eio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
index 7adb5467f..007b9fb70 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void trigger_reset(int fd)
igt_drop_caches_set(fd, DROP_ACTIVE);
/* We expect forced reset and health check to be quick. */
- igt_assert(igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) < 2);
+ igt_assert_lte(igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts), 10);
}
static void manual_hang(int drm_fd)
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
