Quoting Bloomfield, Jon (2019-10-02 14:55:32) > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:20 AM > > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joonas Lahtinen > > <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ursulin, Tvrtko <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>; > > Bloomfield, Jon <jon.bloomfield@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH 21/30] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > > > Replace sampling the engine state every so often with a periodic > > heartbeat request to measure the health of an engine. This is coupled > > with the forced-preemption to allow long running requests to survive so > > long as they do not block other users. > > > > The heartbeat interval can be adjusted per-engine using, > > > > /sys/class/drm/card0/engine/*/heartbeat_interval_ms > > Not true for discrete :-) > > Perhaps: /sys/class/drm/card<n>/engine/*/heartbeat_interval_ms > And again in the code below. I left the extrapolation to the user -- I thought it was clear enough without saying cardN, card<N>, or card?. Though since it's using globing in one location card? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
