On 02/10/2019 12.11, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> While the main goal here is to abstract recurring patterns, and slightly >> clean up the code base by not open coding the ternary operators, there >> are also some space savings to be had via better string constant >> pooling. > > Make that > > """ > While the main goal here is to abstract recurring patterns, and slightly > clean up the code base by not open coding the ternary operators, using > functions to access the strings also makes it easier to seek different > implementation options for potential space savings on string constants > in the future. > """ > > to be more explicit that this change does not directly translate to any > space savings. > > Rasmus, okay with that? It's rather fluffy, but it doesn't make unfounded claims about space savings, so in that regard I'm fine with it. [It's probably just my lack of imagination, but I still fail to see how one could ever achieve better than the linker creating just 1 vmlinux-wide instance of "enabled", which I believe happens regardless of whether one uses these helpers or not.] Rasmus _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
