On 01/10/2019 18:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
Having decided to close the GTT mmap of userptr objects loophole in the
kernel, we need to adjust the test suite to avoid tripping over GTT
mmaps when required.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
index 3fad7d1b3..3f5edaeab 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
@@ -69,11 +69,33 @@
static uint32_t userptr_flags = LOCAL_I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED;
+static bool can_gtt_mmap;
+
#define WIDTH 512
#define HEIGHT 512
static uint32_t linear[WIDTH*HEIGHT];
+static bool has_gtt_mmap(int i915)
+{
+ void *ptr, *map;
+ uint32_t handle;
+
+ igt_assert(posix_memalign(&ptr, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
+
+ gem_userptr(i915, ptr, 4096, 0, 0, &handle);
+ igt_assert(handle != 0);
+
+ map = __gem_mmap__gtt(i915, handle, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
+ if (map)
+ munmap(map, 4096);
+
+ gem_close(i915, handle);
+ free(ptr);
+
+ return map != NULL;
+}
+
static void gem_userptr_test_unsynchronized(void)
{
userptr_flags = LOCAL_I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED;
@@ -853,7 +875,7 @@ static void *umap(int fd, uint32_t handle)
{
void *ptr;
- if (gem_has_llc(fd)) {
+ if (can_gtt_mmap) {
ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, handle, sizeof(linear),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
} else {
@@ -884,7 +906,7 @@ check_bo(int fd1, uint32_t handle1, int is_userptr, int fd2, uint32_t handle2)
sigbus_start = (unsigned long)ptr2;
igt_assert(memcmp(ptr1, ptr2, sizeof(linear)) == 0);
- if (gem_has_llc(fd1)) {
+ if (can_gtt_mmap) {
counter++;
memset(ptr1, counter, size);
memset(ptr2, counter, size);
@@ -971,7 +993,7 @@ static int test_dmabuf(void)
free_userptr_bo(fd1, handle);
close(fd1);
- if (gem_has_llc(fd2)) {
+ if (can_gtt_mmap) {
Kudos to myself I think for coming up with this convoluted test which I
needed 15 minutes to reverse engineer. :) Okay it was many years ago so
that's my excuse. In all cases mmap__gtt is either on userptr or on
dmabuf import of userptr so I think it's correct.
struct sigaction sigact, orig_sigact;
memset(&sigact, 0, sizeof(sigact));
@@ -1225,7 +1247,7 @@ static void test_readonly_mmap(int i915)
original = g_compute_checksum_for_data(G_CHECKSUM_SHA1, pages, sz);
ptr = __gem_mmap__gtt(i915, handle, sz, PROT_WRITE);
- igt_assert(ptr == NULL);
+ igt_require(ptr != NULL);
This should be able to stay unchanged, no? Whether read-only or mmap_gtt
is disallowed it must always be NULL here. Non-NULL should be test fail.
ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(i915, handle, sz, PROT_READ);
gem_close(i915, handle);
@@ -1834,6 +1856,8 @@ igt_main_args("c:", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
igt_require_gem(fd);
gem_require_blitter(fd);
+ can_gtt_mmap = has_gtt_mmap(fd) && gem_has_llc(fd);
+
size = sizeof(linear);
aperture_size = gem_aperture_size(fd);
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
