Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Small joiner RAM buffer size is platform-specific (rev2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:26:22AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Small joiner RAM buffer size is platform-specific (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67195/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6961 -> Patchwork_14545
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14545 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_14545, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14545:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@runner@aborted:
>     - fi-bsw-n3050:       NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@runner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

This appears to be an unrelated GEM bug:

        <3>[  525.646214] process_csb:1920 GEM_BUG_ON(!*execlists->active)
        <4>[  525.646469] ------------[ cut here ]------------
        <2>[  525.646475] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:1920!
        <4>[  525.646494] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
        <4>[  525.646502] CPU: 0 PID: 4286 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G     U 5.3.0-CI-Patchwork_14545+ #1
        <4>[  525.646507] Hardware name:  /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0058.2016.1102.1842 11/02/2016
        <4>[  525.646657] RIP: 0010:process_csb+0x8af/0xad0 [i915]

The minor changes this patch is making to the DSC code isn't even
relevant to the BSW platform.

I'll trigger a CI re-test for this patch.


Matt

>   
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14545 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Issues hit ####
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
>     - fi-bsw-n3050:       [PASS][2] -> [INCOMPLETE][3] ([fdo#105876])
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6961/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
>     - fi-icl-u2:          [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] ([fdo#103167])
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6961/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@xxxxxxxxxx
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
>   
> #### Possible fixes ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
>     - fi-blb-e6850:       [INCOMPLETE][6] ([fdo#107718]) -> [PASS][7]
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6961/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>   * igt@gem_sync@basic-all:
>     - {fi-tgl-u2}:        [INCOMPLETE][8] ([fdo#111647]) -> [PASS][9]
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6961/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_sync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_sync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>   * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
>     - fi-kbl-7500u:       [FAIL][10] ([fdo#111045] / [fdo#111096]) -> [PASS][11]
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6961/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>   
>   {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
>           the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
> 
>   [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
>   [fdo#105876]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105876
>   [fdo#107718]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107718
>   [fdo#111045]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
>   [fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
>   [fdo#111647]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111647
> 
> 
> Participating hosts (51 -> 43)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (8): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-icl-guc fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
>   * Linux: CI_DRM_6961 -> Patchwork_14545
> 
>   CI-20190529: 20190529
>   CI_DRM_6961: d4a6e5482ea2429e4a9322c185eeebdd3c83a077 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   IGT_5203: 82326332f7af336d390e00ae87187bc207fd33dd @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
>   Patchwork_14545: a23fbcee85826735cf064f6b2a143a5edb4243ee @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> 
> 
> == Linux commits ==
> 
> a23fbcee8582 drm/i915: Small joiner RAM buffer size is platform-specific
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14545/index.html

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux