Re: [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915: Move request runtime management onto gt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:29:40)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:24:08)
> > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:17:14)
> > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-25 11:57:53)
> > > > 
> > > > I am still slightly uneasy about having requests, which I see as a GEM 
> > > > concept, be retired from GT, but okay, it's not the most important issue 
> > > > at the moment.
> > > 
> > > requests are not a GEM concept, they belong in sched/ :)
> > 
> > Overall though, the compartmentalisation is intel_gt based. Our
> > timelines and their powermanagement is associated with the gt, so that's
> > where it feels necessary to provide the background cleanup. If we drop
> > the timeline->gt, then I think it's time for a new home?
> 
> Actually would a simple s//intel_gt_retire_timelines()/ make it more
> palatable?

Or even just intel_gt_retire()
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux