On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:55:05PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The disable function can be the same as for MG phy since the same
> registers are used. The others are different as registers changed,
> also adding a empty dkl_pll_write() to be implemented later.
>
> v2:
> Setting the right HIP_INDEX_REG bits (José)
>
> Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 84e734d44828..46dde614bfb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -3086,6 +3086,76 @@ static bool mg_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool dkl_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state)
> +{
> + const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id;
> + enum tc_port tc_port = icl_pll_id_to_tc_port(id);
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + bool ret = false;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv,
> + POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE);
> + if (!wakeref)
> + return false;
> +
> + val = I915_READ(MG_PLL_ENABLE(tc_port));
> + if (!(val & PLL_ENABLE))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> + * All registers read here have the same HIP_INDEX_REG even though
> + * they are on different building blocks
> + */
> + I915_WRITE(HIP_INDEX_REG(tc_port), HIP_INDEX_VAL(tc_port, 0x2));
> +
> + hw_state->mg_refclkin_ctl = I915_READ(DKL_REFCLKIN_CTL(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_refclkin_ctl &= MG_REFCLKIN_CTL_OD_2_MUX_MASK;
> +
> + hw_state->mg_clktop2_hsclkctl =
> + I915_READ(DKL_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_clktop2_hsclkctl &=
> + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_TLINEDRV_CLKSEL_MASK |
> + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_CORE_INPUTSEL_MASK |
> + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_HSDIV_RATIO_MASK |
> + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_DSDIV_RATIO_MASK;
> +
> + hw_state->mg_clktop2_coreclkctl1 =
> + I915_READ(DKL_CLKTOP2_CORECLKCTL1(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_clktop2_coreclkctl1 &=
> + MG_CLKTOP2_CORECLKCTL1_A_DIVRATIO_MASK;
> +
> + hw_state->mg_pll_div0 = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_DIV0(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_pll_div0 &= (DKL_PLL_DIV0_INTEG_COEFF_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_DIV0_PROP_COEFF_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_DIV0_FBPREDIV_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_DIV0_FBDIV_INT_MASK);
> +
> + hw_state->mg_pll_div1 = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_DIV1(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_pll_div1 &= (DKL_PLL_DIV1_IREF_TRIM_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_DIV1_TDC_TARGET_CNT_MASK);
> +
> + hw_state->mg_pll_ssc = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_SSC(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_pll_ssc &= (DKL_PLL_SSC_IREF_NDIV_RATIO_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_SSC_STEP_LEN_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_SSC_STEP_NUM_MASK |
> + DKL_PLL_SSC_EN);
> +
> + hw_state->mg_pll_bias = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_BIAS(tc_port));
> + hw_state->mg_pll_bias &= (DKL_PLL_BIAS_FRAC_EN_H |
> + DKL_PLL_BIAS_FBDIV_FRAC_MASK);
> +
> + hw_state->mg_pll_tdc_coldst_bias =
> + I915_READ(DKL_PLL_TDC_COLDST_BIAS(tc_port));
For the above masking the computed fields is missing.
> +
> + ret = true;
> +out:
> + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static bool icl_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state,
> @@ -3220,6 +3290,12 @@ static void icl_mg_pll_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> POSTING_READ(MG_PLL_TDC_COLDST_BIAS(tc_port));
> }
>
> +static void dkl_pll_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> +}
> +
> static void icl_pll_power_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> i915_reg_t enable_reg)
> @@ -3325,6 +3401,32 @@ static void mg_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */
> }
>
> +static void dkl_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll)
> +{
> + /*
> + * From spec: MG register instances are being used for TypeC in general.
> + * The same MG register instances should be programmed for Dekel PLLs
> + * as well.
Imo BSpec Index/49204 should state it explicitly that the MG and DKL
enable/disable sequence are the same, but let's assume that.
> + */
> + i915_reg_t enable_reg =
> + MG_PLL_ENABLE(icl_pll_id_to_tc_port(pll->info->id));
> +
> + icl_pll_power_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg);
> +
> + dkl_pll_write(dev_priv, pll);
Nit: reusing mg_pll_enable() instead with a platform check here would
make things more symmetric.
With the above fix:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> + /*
> + * DVFS pre sequence would be here, but in our driver the cdclk code
> + * paths should already be setting the appropriate voltage, hence we do
> + * nothing here.
> + */
> +
> + icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg);
> +
> + /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */
> +}
> +
> static void icl_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
> i915_reg_t enable_reg)
> @@ -3467,11 +3569,22 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr ehl_pll_mgr = {
> .dump_hw_state = icl_dump_hw_state,
> };
>
> +static const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs dkl_pll_funcs = {
> + .enable = dkl_pll_enable,
> + .disable = mg_pll_disable,
> + .get_hw_state = dkl_pll_get_hw_state,
> +};
> +
> static const struct dpll_info tgl_plls[] = {
> { "DPLL 0", &combo_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0, 0 },
> { "DPLL 1", &combo_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1, 0 },
> { "TBT PLL", &tbt_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL, 0 },
> - /* TODO: Add typeC plls */
> + { "TC PLL 1", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1, 0 },
> + { "TC PLL 2", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2, 0 },
> + { "TC PLL 3", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3, 0 },
> + { "TC PLL 4", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4, 0 },
> + { "TC PLL 5", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL5, 0 },
> + { "TC PLL 6", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL6, 0 },
> { },
> };
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
