Quoting Martin Peres (2019-09-17 12:39:13) > On 13/09/2019 19:43, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Now that we have CI testing of iommu, let's enable stolen + iommu with a > > lot more confidence that we can diagnose any potential erors. > > AFAIK, we still haven't checked that these machines indeed have the > IOMMU enabled yet. Am I wrong? Hmm, let's have a quick look, https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6906/fi-snb-2600/boot0.txt https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6907/fi-snb-2520m/boot0.txt https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6905/shard-snb6/boot1.txt No iommu https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6905/shard-hsw8/boot1.txt <6>[ 1.540343] pci 0000:00:02.0: Adding to iommu group 1 So only a smattering of coverage on Haswell (didn't check the farm1 ivb/hsw/byt). So indeed hard to draw any conclusion from our test results at present. Hopefully, Tomi will have some success in fighting with the BIOS. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
