Tigerlake does not seem to be suffering from the same fault as Icelake
did, so let the tests run as they should complete within the timeout.
Early tgl results:
basic-small-copy: SUCCESS (1,671s)
forked-basic-small-copy: SUCCESS (37,568s)
medium-copy: SUCCESS (3,307s)
forked-medium-copy: SUCCESS (76,614s)
forked-medium-copy-XY: SUCCESS (203,251s)
forked-medium-copy-odd: SUCCESS (204,265s)
Not great, but nowhere near as bad as icl,
single forked
glk: 2.15s 2.89s
icl: 2.50s 281.08s
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
index ac439cdf8..e2c6ad9a0 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ test_huge_copy(int fd, int huge, int tiling_a, int tiling_b, int ncpus)
uint64_t huge_object_size, i;
unsigned mode = CHECK_RAM;
- igt_fail_on_f(intel_gen(devid) >= 11 && ncpus > 1,
+ igt_fail_on_f(intel_gen(devid) == 11 && ncpus > 1,
"Please adjust your expectations, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110882\n";);
switch (huge) {
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
