Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-12 16:18:08)
>
> On 12/09/2019 14:38, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > index 469dc512cca3..30c542144016 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > @@ -2033,8 +2033,10 @@ struct drm_i915_query {
> > * (data[X / 8] >> (X % 8)) & 1
> > *
> > * - the subslice mask for each slice with one bit per subslice telling
> > - * whether a subslice is available. The availability of subslice Y in slice
> > - * X can be queried with the following formula :
> > + * whether a subslice is available. Gen12 has dual-subslices, which are
> > + * similar to two gen11 subslices. For gen12, this array represents dual-
>
> It's ugly in user facing documentation if we cannot decide whether it is
> Gen12 or gen12. Gen12 special case also probably warrants to be in its
> own paragraph.
Here it was using sentence capitalisation, which suits it if we are
treating it as an ordinary noun. If went with a proper noun, then Gen12
throughout. I might be wrong, but my impression is that we've
historically used ordinary nouns (gen5-8, gen11, etc).
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
