Forcewake handling is a prime suspect now. Keep ref always on tgl to test the theory and reveal the coverage. Testcase: igt/gem_sync Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 141024c66f36..2ab970b4d534 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -1144,7 +1144,10 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915) */ intel_gt_sanitize(&i915->gt, false); - intel_uncore_forcewake_put(&i915->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL); + /* XXX Forcewake handling is a prime suspect now */ + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 12) + intel_uncore_forcewake_put(&i915->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL); + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx