Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] drm/i915/dsb: Enable gamma lut programming using DSB.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On 8/30/2019 7:02 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gamma lut programming can be programmed using DSB
where bulk register programming can be done using indexed
register write which takes number of data and the mmio offset
to be written.

v1: Initial version.
v2: Directly call dsb-api at callsites. (Jani)

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 64 ++++++++++++++--------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  2 +
  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
index 71a0201437a9..e4090d8e4547 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
@@ -589,34 +589,38 @@ static void bdw_load_lut_10(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
  	const struct drm_color_lut *lut = blob->data;
  	int i, lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob);
  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
+	struct intel_dsb *dsb = dev_priv->dsb;
No. Don't put dsb in dev_priv. You have 12 DSB engines, 3 per pipe. You
have intel_crtc for that.

Was this not clear from my previous review?

You have tons of functions here that will never have a DSB engine, it
makes no sense to convert all of them to use the DSB.

- I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe), prec_index |
-		   PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
+			    prec_index | PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
for (i = 0; i < hw_lut_size; i++) {
  		/* We discard half the user entries in split gamma mode */
  		const struct drm_color_lut *entry =
  			&lut[i * (lut_size - 1) / (hw_lut_size - 1)];
- I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe), ilk_lut_10(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_10(entry));
  	}
/*
  	 * Reset the index, otherwise it prevents the legacy palette to be
  	 * written properly.
  	 */
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe), 0);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe), 0);
  }
static void ivb_load_lut_ext_max(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
  {
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+	struct intel_dsb *dsb = dev_priv->dsb;
  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
/* Program the max register to clamp values > 1.0. */
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 0), 1 << 16);
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 1), 1 << 16);
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 2), 1 << 16);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 0), 1 << 16);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 1), 1 << 16);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT_GC_MAX(pipe, 2), 1 << 16);
+
/*
  	 * Program the gc max 2 register to clamp values > 1.0.
@@ -624,9 +628,12 @@ static void ivb_load_lut_ext_max(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
  	 * from 3.0 to 7.0
  	 */
  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 0), 1 << 16);
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 1), 1 << 16);
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 2), 1 << 16);
+		intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 0),
+				    1 << 16);
+		intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 1),
+				    1 << 16);
+		intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_EXT2_GC_MAX(pipe, 2),
+				    1 << 16);
  	}
  }
@@ -788,12 +795,13 @@ icl_load_gcmax(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
  {
  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+	struct intel_dsb *dsb = dev_priv->dsb;
  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
/* Fixme: LUT entries are 16 bit only, so we can prog 0xFFFF max */
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 0), color->red);
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 1), color->green);
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 2), color->blue);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 0), color->red);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 1), color->green);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_GC_MAX(pipe, 2), color->blue);
  }
static void
@@ -803,6 +811,7 @@ icl_program_gamma_superfine_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
  	const struct drm_property_blob *blob = crtc_state->base.gamma_lut;
  	const struct drm_color_lut *lut = blob->data;
+	struct intel_dsb *dsb = dev_priv->dsb;
  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
  	u32 i;
@@ -813,15 +822,16 @@ icl_program_gamma_superfine_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	 * Superfine segment has 9 entries, corresponding to values
  	 * 0, 1/(8 * 128 * 256), 2/(8 * 128 * 256) .... 8/(8 * 128 * 256).
  	 */
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
+			    PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
  		const struct drm_color_lut *entry = &lut[i];
- I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe),
-			   ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe),
-			   ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
  	}
  }
@@ -833,6 +843,7 @@ icl_program_gamma_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	const struct drm_property_blob *blob = crtc_state->base.gamma_lut;
  	const struct drm_color_lut *lut = blob->data;
  	const struct drm_color_lut *entry;
+	struct intel_dsb *dsb = dev_priv->dsb;
  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
  	u32 i;
@@ -847,11 +858,13 @@ icl_program_gamma_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	 * PAL_PREC_INDEX[0] and PAL_PREC_INDEX[1] map to seg2[1],
  	 * with seg2[0] being unused by the hardware.
  	 */
-	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
  	for (i = 1; i < 257; i++) {
  		entry = &lut[i * 8];
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe), ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe), ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
  	}
/*
@@ -868,8 +881,10 @@ icl_program_gamma_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  	 */
  	for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
  		entry = &lut[i * 8 * 128];
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe), ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
-		I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe), ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_ldw(entry));
+		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(dsb, PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe),
+					    ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
  	}
/* The last entry in the LUT is to be programmed in GCMAX */
@@ -980,7 +995,10 @@ void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
  {
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
+ dev_priv->dsb = intel_dsb_get(to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc));
No, don't do this. Don't store crtc specific info in a device global
structure.

  	dev_priv->display.load_luts(crtc_state);
+	intel_dsb_commit(dev_priv->dsb);
+	intel_dsb_put(dev_priv->dsb);
Please localize the use of DSB where needed. Move the gets and puts
within the relevant platform specific ->load_luts hooks.

As per offline discussion, adding get/put call in load_luts hook will be tricky as crtc-state is constant, As suggested by Shashank currently trying to have a single element in crtc-state and will add dsb-get call in atomic check if there is any change in color-property. Will add dsb-commit & dsb-put in commit-tail. Further improvement will be done based on need in future.

Regards,
Animesh

  }
void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7aa11e3dd413..98f546c4ad49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1760,6 +1760,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
  	/* Mutex to protect the above hdcp component related values. */
  	struct mutex hdcp_comp_mutex;
+ struct intel_dsb *dsb;
+
  	/*
  	 * NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
  	 * will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux