On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 15:05 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:25:52AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > SAGV is not currently working for Tiger Lake. We better disable it
> > until
> > the implementation is stabilized and we can enable it.
>
> Does "not currently working" refer to the hardware not working in the
> current stepping, or is it just a matter of us not having proper
> sequences documented yet in the bspec (and gen11's sequences not
> being
> sufficient)?
>
> Something more descriptive than "HACK!" in the comment below might be
> a
> good idea since we're trying to land this upstream.
The information that I had was that in the current stepping it would
not work but doing some searching I found this HSD: 2208191909 So looks
like it was fixed 15 days ago and a new BIOS should fix the issue.
I guess for now we could go with this patch and the revert it when we
confirm that a reliable released BIOS has the fix and adding the HSD to
the commit message.
>
>
> Matt
>
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 4fa9bc83c8b4..7294fcf05323 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3654,6 +3654,10 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > static bool
> > intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > + /* HACK! */
> > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > return (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) &&
> > dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
