On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Each platform supports different gamma modes and each gamma mode
>>> has different bit precision. Here bit precision corresponds
>>> to number of bits the hw LUT supports.
>>>
>>> Add func per platform to return bit precision corresponding to gamma mode
>>> which will be later used as a parameter in lut comparison function
>>> intel_color_lut_equal().
>>>
>>> This is done for legacy, i965, ilk, glk, icl and their variant platforms.
>>>
>>> v6: -Added func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to get bit precision for
>>> gamma and degamma lut readout depending upon platform and
>>> corresponding to load_luts() [Ankit]
>>> -Made patch11 as patch3 [Jani]
>>> v7: -Renamed func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to
>>> intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision()
>>> -Added separate function/platform for gamma bit precision [Ville]
>>> -Corrected checkpatch warnings
>>> v8: -Split patch 3 into 4 separate patches
>>> v9: -Changed commit message, gave more info [Uma]
>>> -Added precision func for icl+ platform
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Ooops, finger slipped this to the wrong patch. Was supposed to be for
patch 2...
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> index 71a0201..dcc65d7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> @@ -1371,6 +1371,105 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 16;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if ((crtc_state->csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int chv_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
>>> + return 10;
>>> + else
>>> + return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>
>> Why does one branch check for ->gamma_enable and the other not? See below.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>
>> Why does this function not check for ->gamma_enable but the others do?
>> See below.
>>
>>> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
>>> + return 16;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> +
>>
>> Should the ->gamma_enable check be here once, instead?
>>
>> With that fixed,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>>> + if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>>> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>>> + return chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else
>>> + return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + } else {
>>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>>> + return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>>> + return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
>>> + return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>> {
>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> index 057e8ac..0226d3a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@
>>> void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> void intel_color_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>
>>> #endif /* __INTEL_COLOR_H__ */
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
