Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-08-26 18:56:53) > > > On 8/24/2019 1:54 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Note that this requires us to fix the tagging so that we don't perform a > > lite-restore from the reloc instance to the user instance. > > What's wrong with lite-restoring in this case? It's not something we > stop now AFAICS. I have patches to fix the regression. But the question is whether or not the pre-parser is happy to cross the lite-restore boundary. If it is a light lite-restore and there is no cache invalidation... -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
