Quoting Stuart Summers (2019-08-23 17:03:03) > Add a subslice stride calculation when setting subslices. This > aligns more closely with the userspace expectation of the subslice > mask structure. > > v2: Use local variable for subslice_mask on HSW and > clean up a few other subslice_mask local variable > changes > v3: Add GEM_BUG_ON for ss_stride to prevent array overflow (Chris) > Split main set function and refactors in intel_device_info.c > into separate patches (Chris) > v4: Reduce ss_stride size check when setting subslices per slice > based on actual expected max stride (Chris) > Move that GEM_BUG_ON check for the ss_stride out to the patch > which adds the ss_stride > v5: Use memcpy instead of looping through each stride index > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
