Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-19 18:23:51) > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Use 0 for the unordered context > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/65426/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6737 -> Patchwork_14082 > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14082 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_14082, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/ > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14082: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts: > - fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > - fi-ivb-3770: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > - fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] > [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > - fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] > [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > - fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] > [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > - fi-byt-n2820: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] > [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6737/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html > [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14082/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html Hmm. We haven't removed the struct_mutex around i915_vma_destroy() yet, so it can't be that. Consider it's only gen7, that suggests it's the pd_vma. But that's in gen6_ppgtt_cleanup() not the free_objects callers. Weird. Time for a bisection. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
