Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-19 10:15:26) > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14078: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-gtt: > - fi-snb-2520m: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6734/fi-snb-2520m/igt@gem_exec_reloc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14078/fi-snb-2520m/igt@gem_exec_reloc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx That's the lack of lifting vma->ops->set_pages(). Partial/rotated/remapped pages require allocations. > * igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic: > - fi-bwr-2160: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] +7 similar issues > [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6734/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_render_linear_blits@xxxxxxxxxx > [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14078/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_render_linear_blits@xxxxxxxxxx Not sure what's upsetting Broadwater. Hmm, we are rearranging the PTE writes to be after the execbuf chipset/gtt-flush now. Could be. > * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic: > - fi-ivb-3770: [PASS][61] -> [DMESG-WARN][62] > [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6734/fi-ivb-3770/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@xxxxxxxxxx > [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14078/fi-ivb-3770/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@xxxxxxxxxx Sigh, I was trying to save the display changes for a later patch. Looks like I missed a path to vm->mutex and so they need converting at the same time. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
