Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-08-18 11:16:56) > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:00:11 +0200, Chris Wilson > <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-08-18 10:52:04) > >> There is no need to mark whole GPU as wedged just because > >> of the custom HuC fw failure as users can always verify > >> actual HuC firmware status using existing HUC_STATUS ioctl. > > > > If we try and fail, would it not be worth a dev_notice? > > if GuC is ok and if HuC was enabled there will be something like this: > > <6> i915 0000:00:02.0: GuC firmware i915/kbl_guc_33.0.0.bin version 33.0 > submission:disabled > <6> i915 0000:00:02.0: HuC firmware i915/kbl_huc_ver02_00_1810.bin version > 2.0 authenticated:no > > otherwise we should get: > > <5> i915 0000:00:02.0: GuC is uninitialized But can we not fail to load HuC leaving GuC setup? E.g. for the fabled submission backend? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
