On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 11:24 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 04:51:17PM -0700, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli > Pradeep wrote: > > Removing restriction on Pipe A as TigerLake onwards, all the pipes > > support DSC. > > May be elaborate this commit message a little bit something like: > "On previous platforms, DSC was not supported on Pipe A while > starting TGL, its is supported > on all pipes. So remove the DSC and FEC restriction on Pipe A for TGL > onwards. > Alright, will update that for rev2. > > > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep < > > madhumitha.tolakanahalli.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > index 4884c87c8ed7..a5b50f93fac5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > @@ -1739,8 +1739,12 @@ static bool > > intel_dp_source_supports_fec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > { > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); > > > > - return INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && > > - pipe_config->cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_A; > > + /* On TGL, DSC is supported on all Pipes */ > > ^^^^ FEC supported on all pipes Oops, will change this. > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) > > + return true; > > + else > > + return INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 11 && > > + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_A; > > } > > > > static bool intel_dp_supports_fec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > @@ -1755,8 +1759,12 @@ static bool > > intel_dp_source_supports_dsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > { > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); > > > > - return INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 && > > - pipe_config->cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_A; > > + /* On TGL, DSC is supported on all Pipes */ > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) > > + return true; > > + else > > + return (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 10 || > > INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 11) && > > Why cant you just use INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=10 ? INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 was the existing condition. With the new condition added, there would be an overlapping set ie INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 would still be TRUE for GEN >= 12. Though this wouldn't affect the logic of the code, thought it would make more sense to sperate it out this way. > > Manasi > > > + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_A; > > } > > > > static bool intel_dp_supports_dsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx