When testing whether we prevent suppressing preemption, it helps to avoid a time slice expiring prematurely. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c index 91f1c9012489..b797be1627e9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c @@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg) goto err_wedged; } + /* Keep postponing the timer to avoid premature slicing */ + mod_timer(&engine->execlists.timer, jiffies + HZ); for (depth = 0; depth < 8; depth++) { rq_b = spinner_create_request(&b.spin, b.ctx, engine, @@ -938,7 +940,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg) igt_spinner_end(&a.spin); if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) { - pr_err("Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n", + pr_err("Preemption on %s recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n", + engine->name, engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count, depth); err = -EINVAL; -- 2.23.0.rc1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
