On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2019-08-06 11:07:21) >> The big theme here is to emphasize that intel_drv.h is a display header, so >> rename it display/intel_display_types.h and reduce its use in non-display >> code. Also reduce the inclusion of that and the other mega header i915_drv.h >> from other headers. >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> >> Jani Nikula (10): >> drm/i915: move intel_display.c function declarations >> drm/i915/sprite: un-inline icl_is_hdr_plane() >> drm/i915/irq: un-inline functions to avoid i915_drv.h include >> drm/i915/bw: make intel_atomic_get_bw_state() static >> drm/i915/mst: un-inline intel_dp_mst_encoder_active_links() >> drm/i915/tc: un-inline intel_tc_port_ref_held() >> drm/i915: avoid including intel_drv.h via i915_drv.h->i915_trace.h >> drm/i915: rename intel_drv.h to display/intel_display_types.h >> drm/i915: remove unnecessary includes of intel_display_types.h header >> drm/i915: move property enums to intel_display_types.h > > A few moments of exasperation of "we use that there!?", but looks all > dandy. I didn't spot anything other than mechanical translations and I > agree with the direction, > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Pushed the lot, many thanks for reviewing these tedious patches! BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
