Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-08-04 21:27:38) > On Sun, 04 Aug 2019 22:18:51 +0200, Patchwork > <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * igt@runner@aborted: > > - fi-cml-u2: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] > > [1]: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13866/fi-cml-u2/igt@runner@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > hmm, looks unrelated (this CML is not using guc/huc at all) > > <7>[ 9.344398] [drm:intel_uc_init_early [i915]] enable_guc=0 (guc:no > submission:no huc:no) > ... > <4>[ 486.270801] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > <4>[ 486.270843] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next > (ffff8883c0fe17d8), but was ffff8883cb29c5a8. (prev=ffff8883cb29c5a8). That really needs the timeline patches, if only for the lockdep markup. But I think it's drm/i915: Protect request retirement with timeline->mutex judging from the probable race. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
