On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:30:19 +0200, Chris Wilson
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-02 14:12:38)
== Series Details ==
Series: add more probe failures (rev6)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64390/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6614 -> Patchwork_13848
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_13848 absolutely need
to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_13848, please notify your bug team to allow
them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
in CI.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13848/
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_13848:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- fi-cfl-guc: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6614/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13848/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looks like we didn't flush the cleanup we started before reporting the
error. Maybe,
it's "leaked" guc err log, that we now try to free after gem, see:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip/commit/?id=6f76098fe0f3f0b519b2ad528b4319195d6d0f73
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx