Quoting Kumar Valsan, Prathap (2019-08-01 21:33:44)
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:21:51PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Recently discovered in commit bdae33b8b82b ("drm/i915: Use maximum write
> > flush for pwrite_gtt") was that we needed to our full write barrier
> > before changing the GGTT PTE to ensure that our indirect writes through
> > the GTT landed before the PTE changed (and the writes end up in a
> > different page). That also applies to our GGTT relocation path.
>
> Chris,
>
> As i understand, changing the GGTT PTE also an indirect write. If so, isn't a wmb()
> should be good enough.
Ha! If only that was true.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
