On 2019-07-30 12:45 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:24 PM Koenig, Christian > <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 30.07.19 um 11:38 schrieb Daniel Vetter: >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:45:57AM +0000, Koenig, Christian wrote: > >>>>> +#define DRM_MEM_SYSTEM 0 >>>>> +#define DRM_MEM_STOLEN 1 >>>> I think we need a better naming for that. >>>> >>>> STOLEN sounds way to much like stolen VRAM for integrated GPUs, but at >>>> least for TTM this is the system memory currently GPU accessible. >>> Yup this is wrong, for i915 we use this as stolen, for ttm it's the gpu >>> translation table window into system memory. Not the same thing at all. >> >> Thought so. The closest I have in mind is GTT, but everything else works >> as well. > > Would your GPU_MAPPED above work for TT? I think we'll also need > STOLEN, I'm even hearing noises that there's going to be stolen for > discrete vram for us ... Could i915 use DRM_MEM_PRIV for stolen? Or is there other hardware with something similar? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
